‘In some companies, employees are allowed to express their feelings and opinions about the company by sending electronic messages to everyone in the company. In other companies, this type of communication is strictly prohibited.’
What restrictions, if any, do you think companies should place on employees’ electronic communications? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
Communication is the basic need of any human being, being able to express their thoughts. It is a necessary measure for cohesion of any organisation, be it micro or macro. The concept of communication however, is a two sided coin and can be implemented positively or negatively. The statement provided displays a classic example of the same in the form of communication in a work environment. Restricting a mode of communication would seem like a harsh measure for any employee in a company, but it is a necessary measure to ensure a smoother and more streamlined functioning of an office
If companies are inclined to allow employees to send electronic message communication to express their feelings, the admins should monitor the type of content being circulated through these company wide messages. Consider a hypothetical instance, where a person expresses their disapproval against a decision taken by the company to implement a and highlighting the image of the company in a negative way, just because the employee feels that way. Now this could be a comment with constructive criticism and could help the company improve on their decision making process as a whole. But given the negative connotation applied to it, it could lead to a negative opinion to be formed against the company. So the company should place a restriction, stating that instead of sending a company wide message, the employee could discuss this problem with their respective team leaders and the team leaders in turn could help rectify this at a grassroot level.
The public image of any company is one of the vital factors of the popularity and social standing of the company. This, however, could be seriously damaged by the unmoderated opinions of the employees. For instance, an employee does not receive his salary on the decided date and he decides to diatribe against the company by expressing his opinions by electronic messages whilst using unparliamentary language. This has serious repercussions on the company's image and leads to an image of instability of the company. Restrictions on such behaviour by declaring to use formal and proper language to address anything about the company can moderate this situation.
Hence, restrictions are important in any form of communication as it provides a medium to the employees to express their feelings about the company and at the same time, maintaining the required discipline and formality required for functioning of any organisation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | tanayjawle | 66 | view |
| 2021-09-30 | sanket_chaudhary | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the vice president of Gigantis a development company that builds and leases retail store facilities Nationwide over the past five years sales have increased significantly at outlet stores that deal exclusively i 78
- The following appeared as part of an article in a popular science magazine Scientists must typically work 60 to 80 hours a week if they hope to further their careers consequently good and affordable all day child care must be made available to both male a 68
- In some companies employees are allowed to express their feelings and opinions about the company by sending electronic messages to everyone in the company In other companies this type of communication is strictly prohibited What restrictions if any do you 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...ype of content being circulated through these company wide messages. Consider a hypothetical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion taken by the company to implement a and highlighting the image of the compan...
^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d highlighting the image of the company in a negative way, just because the employee feels that w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17705735661 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09551354233 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503740648379 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.7332081141 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7333333333 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434324679711 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136675970936 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907057107282 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254755937972 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096936150507 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...ype of content being circulated through these company wide messages. Consider a hypothetical ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sion taken by the company to implement a and highlighting the image of the compan...
^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d highlighting the image of the company in a negative way, just because the employee feels that w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17705735661 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09551354233 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503740648379 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.7332081141 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.4 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7333333333 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434324679711 0.243740707755 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136675970936 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907057107282 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254755937972 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096936150507 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.