In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Presently, the harmony between the personal achievement and equality has been the point of interest for many people. The ideology of self-improvement is a controversy between believers in equality in chances and those who follow the path of their own manners. This essay will try to cover both controversial sides and the bas ideas supporting each belief.
As days pass, the world tends to shift more and more to democracy” from the people to the people”, encouraging every individual to work on themselves as it is guaranteed to be rewarded for yourself achievements. Egalitarianism supporters, not only, shimmer the idea of all or non-society, but also, they dim the individuals’ own manners and values. For example, after the French revolution the government followed by the people, adopted and applied the egalitarian community, which lead to rise in discrimination levels. In other words, the different cannot really succeed.
The other perspective sees that success must be built on self-individual compass, whether they succeed or not, it is totally based on the individual perspectives. After that, they can find their fitting seat in society. To take as an example, what America provides as free environment for people to do and work as they see fit for themselves. As a result, the individual’s success inside The American society didn’t confine to race, religion, gender or age.
The equality in environment and community and self-achievement cannot be addressed but as one entity with different arguable aspects, hence for codependency. In my opinion it is vital for the personal success to be based on individual merits but under the umbrella of the egalitarian society rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | tata | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | tathanhthao | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | tata | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-11 | Dhruv Singh | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Catherinataylor08102008 | 89 | view |
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What effects will this have on society 61
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 73
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...ends to shift more and more to democracy” from the people to the people”, encoura...
^
Line 2, column 97, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...democracy” from the people to the people”, encouraging every individual to work o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, really, so, for example, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31481481481 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21975426986 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1038377456 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230150017494 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734905552446 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710569598873 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132774839231 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509125593932 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.