Many people believe that the current system of both teacher and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050. to what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Currently, due to the development of technology and society that brings a profusion of benefits, especially technological education. many people believe that the method of education between teacher and pupil might be restricted or eliminated by 2050. From my perspective, I partially agree with this idea. this essay will explain and give some examples to illustrate my point.
On the one hand, due to the advancement of technology, it forms a solid fundation to the appearance of online smart education. In Viet Nam recently, although there are many students stay at home, it can acquire more knowledge through teacher in the internet by many websites or social media platforms such as: Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Youtube. For example, many teachers became well known on the internet by upload videos related to education or taught online free, resulting in various students around the country engage with them. Moreover, the quality of education will be enhanced than because it is augmented by ai, particularly ai assisted student and teacher gain profusion of knowledge from global resource recorded over time.
On the other hand, the classroom with teacher and student will be easier than because they are assisted by smart education, however the method of education in the classroom which have student and teacher must continue to exist in the future. teachers play an essential role in quality of lesson in the classroom which help student receive knowledge easier than if they only study in the internet with ai. For instance, when student ran up against at sufficient issue and they sorted the problem out with the teacher who can help student everywhere if they need.
In conclusion, I believe that the smart education play a significant role in the education but they unable to substuite the teacher and pupil in the classroom. although the method of taught to student in teacher less attractive than various of education video in the internet, it brought more achievement than if student studied in the internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Tạ Phương Trà | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | An Hai Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-24 | Quyenhaidang | 68 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Jenny213987 | 79 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ts, especially technological education. many people believe that the method of educa...
^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...tive, I partially agree with this idea. this essay will explain and give some exampl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugmented by ai, particularly ai assisted student and teacher gain profusion of kn...
^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teachers
...r must continue to exist in the future. teachers play an essential role in quality of le...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...the teacher and pupil in the classroom. although the method of taught to student in teac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18844984802 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71218992122 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525835866261 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.164509915 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.307692308 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237136725384 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896793991242 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543132595197 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148536070825 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.036747995456 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.