Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
In recent years, tourists have become more likely to take organized trips to see remote areas and communities. This essay will discuss the reasons why I believe this development could have an equal amount of positive and negative effects.
The growth of the tourism industry can be seen as beneficial for local people. Firstly, the main reason is that the more people visit these areas, the more opportunities to develop the business and generate economic value. For instance, more people are likely to find work in hotels, restaurants, and other tourist service providers in these tourist destinations. Furthermore, in order to attract more tourists who are interested in exploring the wild, the authorities of these areas must invest in preserving the environment and its rich biodiversity so that visitors can enjoy the experience.
Despite the favorable impacts mentioned above, I believe that tourism can also be considered as a detrimental development to some extent. The main drawback is that this can result in disturbing the lives of local people and the environment. In addition, visitors frequently trash wherever they go and may harm animals with their bad behavior. Another downside of this trend, in order to meet the demand of tourists, local people have cut down a large majority of old trees to build areas for entertainment. For instance, Vietnam is also known as a country with the most deforestation and the reason for this is poorly-planted infrastructure in remote places.
In conclusion, while organized tourism may help the economy and people in remote locations greatly, I believe that the negative environmental repercussions of this scenario are significantly more severe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | chips_0506 | 81 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 73
- We can derive knowledge from the news but some people think we can t trust journalists What do you think What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 87
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 89
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 Million Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31481481481 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00310995639 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4456638933 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25255490492 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084891809238 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388209788748 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14741062721 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143663723298 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.