Some people think residents should keep their streets clean and tidy while others say it is government’s responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The significance of streets which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others disagree. However, a few numbers of individuals believe that population should concern in about roads to keep spin and span when others feel it is only authorities’ duty. In my opinion, this is a main rule for everyone to clean roads always which is more logical. This essay will elaborate both aspects along with examples in the looming paragraphs.
To begin with many public, maintain the motor way as own assets and try to make tidy. Moreover, a fair road provides to people as healthier as well as wealthier. To take an example, the way where is dirtiness is absent, Individuals can take fresh air along with keep fit body. For that reason, they care shine in career with better economic sectors. For instance, most of the European success in work life to maintain a healthy life and through saving the country's assets such as streets. Thus, it is clear that everyone should be focused on nation's roads as own asset instead of government's duty.
On the other hand, governments should provide all of the responsibilities to keep clean the roads. Therefore, population has a right to receive better service from nations. According to this service, authorities should organize teams for cleaning in every area of countries and they should keep clean and tidy roads from morning to night. Hence, every government should maintain all responsibilities for residents.
To sum up, according to the arguments one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of streets are instrumental indeed. However, every people should keep clean roads instead of authorities.
- The chart shows the percentage of Irish language speaker in five provinces in five years
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant
- Mobile phones and the Internet have made it easy to stay in contact with other people However as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers there is less face to face contact and direct communication Is the growing use of communications technol 61
- The chart blow shows the percentage of Irish language speakers by province Leinster Munster Connacht and Ulter in the Republic of Ireland State in between 1981 and 2002
- We have become a disposable society preferring to buy new products rather than repair existing items Why do you think this is How can this trend be reversed 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ir road provides to people as healthier as well as wealthier. To take an example, ...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... other hand, governments should provide all of the responsibilities to keep clean the road...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78941904502 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9956791679 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226268339256 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742839667757 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742894852687 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141331914142 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660182743121 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ir road provides to people as healthier as well as wealthier. To take an example, ...
^^
Line 5, column 47, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... other hand, governments should provide all of the responsibilities to keep clean the road...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10283687943 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78941904502 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9956791679 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9375 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8125 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226268339256 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742839667757 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742894852687 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141331914142 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660182743121 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.