The graph below shows changes in global food and oil prices between 2000 and 2011.
The line graph compares the average price of a barrel of oil with the food price index over a period of 11 years.
It is clear that average global prices of oil and food rose considerably between 2000 and 2011. Furthermore, the trends for both commodities were very similar, so a strong correlation (93.6%) is suggested.
In the year 2000, the average oil price was close to $25 per barrel and the food price index stood at just under 90 points. Over the following four years, both prices remained relatively stable, before rising steadily between 2004 and 2007. By 2007, oil prices had more than doubled, at nearly $60 per barrel, and food prices had risen to approximately 130 points.
A dramatic increase in both prices of commodities can be seen from 2007 to 2008, the oil price reached a peak of roughly $130 per barrel and the food price index also rose to over 220 points. However, by the beginning of 2009, oil prices had dropped significantly by around $90 per barrel and food prices were down by about 80 points. Finally, in 2011, the prices rose once again, the food price index reached its peak at nearly 240 points and the average oil price increased to almost $100 per barrel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-08 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58490566038 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37173638912 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2960539063 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344114211314 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18478840709 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120544308206 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243168443448 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239711627752 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58490566038 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37173638912 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533018867925 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2960539063 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344114211314 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18478840709 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120544308206 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243168443448 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239711627752 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.