Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
A country's history is embodied in a large number of legally protected historic buildings. Some believe they ought to be demolished and replaced with modern ones. Meanwhile, this essay will outline its important aspects, in my viewpoint, they should stand with the current refurbishment.
First of all, it is obvious that preserving certain old buildings provides historical value of human life in terms of research development. Undoubtedly, their architectural constructions since archaeological evidences of the past may assist scientist to comprehend the core of cultural civilisation time to time. The pyramid of Giza, primarily slow-setting gypsum mortar — made from plaster and sand — inspire current engineers to create structures in drier areas. Furthermore, museums have been validated as the safest place to protect historical objects. Proven by Texas Historical Commission, their areas are set in constant climate creating favourable atmosphere and humidity levels to sustainably maintain perishable artefacts.
Conversely, we should reconcile that modernization of heritage buildings cannot be discouraged as this can achieve civilian harm and disaster mitigations. Considering that, most worldwide ancient building structures have been renovated to be well-designed without reducing its essence, in order to avert collapse as happened to the Old Courthouse, UK. Moreover, this revitalization may foster a wider building purpose both to enhance cultural landmarks preservation and to catch numerous tourists’ attention. The extensive periodic control of Colosseum has shaped better structural maintenance, transforming amphitheatre to a beautiful place for pre-wedding photoshoots.
In summary, it seems to me that maintaining old buildings brings greater significance to a nation, including sources of cultural history and best artefact storage. Meanwhile, the refurbishment of such structures is suggested to prevent building collapse and engage in more functional prospects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
2024-11-11 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
2024-11-08 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
2024-11-08 | honganhb2409759 | 56 | view |
2024-11-06 | Lư Kim Ngân | 56 | view |
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation s history Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones How important is it to maintain old buildings Should history stand in the way of progress 84
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 75
- Shops should not be allowed to sell any food or drinks that have been scientifically proven to be bad for people s health To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Tourism has been a good source of revenue in many countries and government should promote the industry Do you agree or disagree 61
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 281 350
No. of Characters: 1670 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.094 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.943 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.21 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 143 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 96 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 69 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.071 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.559 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.29 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.024 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5