Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is a recent issue that the pleasant or unpleasant advertisements rarely affect several societies during purchasing behaviour. I, personally, consent to positive reasons from this tropical issue which I will elucidate more below.
To begin with, the influence of fascinating advertisements on shopping activities could lead people to be more familiar with the advertising-related products. With social media presence, pop-up ads may expose consumer decision to purchase such items due to public perception of trusted brand. Moreover, the exposure of visually stimulating ads could captivate children’s attention which will impact their consumer behaviours. As the target of business marketing strategy, they would arouse parents’ impulsive buying behaviour. Reportedly, Happy Meals from McDonald as a means to parents’ reward initiates American kids to crave on any menu served.
On the other hand, one of contributing factors which influence societies to decide what to buy is the functional value of a product. In connection with trusted brands with excellent reviews, modern society prioritise the durability and quality could reduce the risk and cost of repairing an item. Furthermore, several job fields might need specific products to support job productivity. To illustrate, graphic designers most likely select the proper laptop specification (operating systems and Video Graphics Array) to complete a pleasing visual design. If they achieve self-satisfaction, the higher possibility they will increase job performance at workplace.
In conclusion, in my standpoint, people’s shopping habits are less affected by disturbing or amazing advertisements because the most considerable factors are essential value and specific features of the products. This is as long as as the number of promising ads remains popular in common society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | vutamdan | 67 | view |
- Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- People believe famous people s support towards international aid organisations draws attention to the problem while other think celebrities make the problem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Eco tourism often involves visiting remote and fragile ecosystems which raises concerns about the impact on local cultures and indigenous communities What problems can this cause How can these problems be resolved 89
- In recent times economic growth has helped many become richer both in developed and developing countries However those in developed countries are not as happy as they were in the past Why is this What can be learned from this 89
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'several jobs'.
Suggestion: several jobs
...cost of repairing an item. Furthermore, several job fields might need specific products to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: as
...atures of the products. This is as long as as the number of promising ads remains pop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85239852399 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22926090285 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686346863469 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9267668693 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139582129737 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428543445909 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478357131361 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769294408483 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192882689195 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'several jobs'.
Suggestion: several jobs
...cost of repairing an item. Furthermore, several job fields might need specific products to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: as
...atures of the products. This is as long as as the number of promising ads remains pop...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.85239852399 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22926090285 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686346863469 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9267668693 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139582129737 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428543445909 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478357131361 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769294408483 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192882689195 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.