The two maps below show road access to city hospital; in 2007 and in 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate road access related to a city hospital changed considerably in its form in 2007 and in 2010.
It is obvious that the city hospital 2010 expanded the bus station on the western side allowing more space and accessibility to Hospital Rd. The ring road had two entire gages in 2010.
As can be seen, the size of the city hospital has not changed in 2007 and in 2010, while adding two roundabouts at the entire end of Hospital Rd which joint with the bus station located next to it. A public car park located close to the city hospital that has its own entry in the east of the ring road in 2010. Another entry is for the staff car park. These two staff car parks and public car parks separated with each own entry in 2010. By 2010 there were six bus stops that were removed.
As a result, the new city hospital has more facilities with better road accessibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-15 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 34 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3696969697 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28123659537 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2259335287 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264327754481 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129982114969 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965755844753 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201435223504 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767357319691 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 721.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3696969697 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28123659537 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521212121212 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2259335287 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264327754481 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129982114969 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965755844753 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201435223504 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767357319691 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.07 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.