It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
The modern era of urbanization has witnessed a severe extinction of animal species as their habitats have become continuously hazardous. Some argue that it is a futile endeavor for humans to interfere with natural processes to protect endangered fauna. Despite acknowledging the logic behind this assertion, to some extent, I still opine that people should be accountable for this issue.
On the one hand, to some extent, proponents for non-intervention in wildlife disappearance are rational. First and foremost, it is the inherent part of the revolutionary process on the Earth maintaining a healthy, thriving, and diverse ecosystem. In fact, many species, including dinosaurs, succumbed to cataclysmic climate changes that led to their demise, followed by an emergence of new species that are supposed to be descendants of the formers with more robust survival abilities. Therefore, all attempts to hinder extinction, according to this view, interfere with the natural order of the planet, meaning that it may cause disadvantages rather than generating any practical benefit. Moreover, all efforts spent on conserving threatened animals may not guarantee desired outcomes while demand exorbitant expenses that should be allocated to other more societal pressing problems.
However, I still believe that people should take immediate action to alleviate this issue for reasons related to human impacts on the environment and the values endangered species can offer. Human beings, as conscious stewards, are under an imperative moral obligation to mitigate the negative impacts of their activities and preserve the diversity of the environment. Indeed, mass deforestation to build infrastructure or harvest timber, overhunting, and pollution due to industrial waste have cost animals their living habitats and food chain, affecting biodiversity and potentially causing a domino effect on other interconnected species. Besides, another aspect is that endangered animals may possess unique genetic traits which should be studied thoroughly in order to pave the way for breakthroughs in medicine, biotechnology, and other scientific domains. For instance, a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States reports that a compound found in sharks which is known as squalamine has the potential to be used as a broad-spectrum antiviral agent in humans.
In conclusion, while the natural process of extinction has been a recurring phenomenon throughout the Earth’s history, I would take the view that people should hinder it to save threatened species. Preventing fauna from disappearance is not only an ethical duty but also crucial for groundbreaking discoveries that can greatly benefit humanity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- More and more people today are spending large amounts of money on their complexions to look younger Why do people want to look younger Do you think this is a positive or negative progression 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2338.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68856447689 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15469427206 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608272506083 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3516182331 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.866666667 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169486252829 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541722873884 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477120158614 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112164642923 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445407210643 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 78.4519038076 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.