The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This diagram show that overall of recycling rate for selected materials from 1982 to 2010. The figures for four various materials exhibit that it were recycled in a particular country.
It can be clearly seen the bar chart show that paper and cardboard are the highest percentage of other materials according to the recycling rate. On the other hand, plastics are the lowest percentage.
The recycling rate was a slightly different between plastics and aluminum cans from 1982 to 1990. The proportion of recycling plastics stood at a slightly less than 10% all over the whole period. The recycling of aluminum can rose steadily from 1990 to 2010. Throughout this period the recycling percentage peaked at almost 50%. The glass containers recycling rate steady at 50% in 1982. Afterwords the rate dipped from 1982 to 1990 and settle down at 40%
At the end of 1990 the rate increased to 50% again, after that the rate maintained high and steady raised till get 60% in 2010.
In contrast the recycling rate of paper and cardboard stayed higher than other materials. The rate was plateaued and never slumped under 60% all over the whole period. But the rate was fluctuated from 1982 to 1994. At the end of 1994 the rate peaked at the highest percentage 80%. Subsequently, the rate decrease tardily till reached 70% by the end of 2010.
We can see that overall the highest percentage of recycling rate material is paper and cardboard 80% in 1994, and the lowest percentage of recycling rate is plastics less than 5% in 1982.
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 70
- Public libraries should provide books and not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or Dvds Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional areas outside large urban centers do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ess than 10% all over the whole period. The recycling of aluminum can rose steadily...
^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...eady raised till get 60% in 2010. In contrast the recycling rate of paper and cardboa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84732824427 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50650339944 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450381679389 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3131313085 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.375 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18527302812 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827084455496 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729308385548 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118325512329 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980860568781 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ess than 10% all over the whole period. The recycling of aluminum can rose steadily...
^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...eady raised till get 60% in 2010. In contrast the recycling rate of paper and cardboa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84732824427 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50650339944 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450381679389 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3131313085 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.375 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4375 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18527302812 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827084455496 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729308385548 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118325512329 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980860568781 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.