The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This bar chart compares the proportion of recycled amounts of four
Different materials Paper& cardboard, Glass containers , and
Plastics
In the Early Eighties the total number of recycled Paper& cardboard and Glass containers Amounted to two thirds and half accordingly Paper& cardboard steadily
Increased in the next five years until it reached 70% and in the next five years it regained
It’s initial value of 60% while on the other hand Glass containers slightly decreased to 40%
in the Same decade then they both had a sudden raise form 65% and 40% to 80% and 50% in half a decade then in the next decade and half while Paper& cardboard steadily decreased numbering 70% Glass containers continued to increase totaling 60%
recycling of Alumininium cans didn’t start until the late Eighties and it was less than ten percent and Plastics started in the nineties and it came to a standstill of around 9% in two decades while spiked up from 5% to close to 50%
To sum up the data clearly shows that Paper& cardboard and Glass containers have Similar recycling rates from the start and Alumininium cans increased recently
And that Plastics are the lowest
- In your opinion should young people choose their profession or should their parents choose for them 56
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 84
- The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 78
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list What are the reasons for this What can be done to solve this problem 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rials Paper& cardboard, Glass containers , and Plastics In the Early Eighties th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, still, then, third, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98979591837 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55428324692 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 196.0 22.4926829268 871% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 978.0 112.824112599 867% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 196.0 22.9334400587 855% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 72.0 5.23603664747 1375% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0727675088296 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727675088296 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407976550952 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460557234137 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 100.1 13.2329268293 756% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -110.54 61.2550243902 -180% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 77.4 10.3012195122 751% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.74 8.06136585366 208% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 52.0 11.4329268293 455% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 80.4 10.9970731707 731% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.