When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
The statement claim that the old buildings should be reconstructed and could be better used for modern purpose rather than preservation of the historic buildings. I agree with this statement inasmuch as by reconstructing the historic building, land can be used properly and this is necessary due to overgrowth population and lack of useful lands. Also the new building can contribute economically than the historic ancient building. And this types of building are dangerous because any simple earthquake or natural disaster can break the whole construction can bring dangerous situation. However, old and ancient building has some historic values and this is necessary to preserve and show the culture of the nation. This ancient buildings can help in research and also can contribute in economy by making them as a tourist spot.
One compelling argument in favor of my position is modern building can contribute more than historic building in terms of recent purpose. Now a days population is growing more faster and the useful land is decreased gradually. So it is unnecessary to preserve an ancient old building. Because it can occupy the more land and by reconstructed the modern building, land can be used and utilized properly. For example, by reconstructing an old building, a new modern building can be build and used as an office, technological hub or shopping mall. This will contribute more in economic rather than the historic building.
Second argument is the historic building can be used for as an industry or mill or factory rather than preserve this. This will contribute huge to grow the economic and the land will be used properly. For example if a rice factory is constructed in the place of old building then the product of this rice factory will contribute more than the historic building.
Moreover, the historic old building can be dangerous in any simple natural disaster. like earthquake and the whole infrastructure can be broken.
However, a historic old building has some historic values that is more important in terms of tradition and culture. To preserve the culture and tradition of any nation then historic value have to preserve. Historic buildings are necessary to do research in history and the old building carry the information of its time that is more important to know the culture of this time. In addition, historic building also can contribute in economic because it can be a tourist spot.
In conclusion, due to lack of proper land, historic building should reconstruct and use in modern purpose is more effective than preserve the building. But some ancient building that carry more cultural value should preserve and should open for tourist so that this building also can contribute in economy. So it is important to measure the historic value of the building properly and should take proper step by measuring them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-29 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-06 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | swetha_14r | 54 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Teyyub | 50 | view |
- The world of work is changing fapidly working conditions today are not same as before and people no longer rely on job for life Discuss the possible reasons for these changes and give your suggestions on how people should prepare for work in future 56
- The bar chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the last year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 54
- The graph below shows a conference hall built in 1981 and planned for 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The picture below shows the use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...th population and lack of useful lands. Also the new building can contribute economi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...ic building in terms of recent purpose. Now a days population is growing more faster and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...lding in terms of recent purpose. Now a days population is growing more faster and t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...rpose. Now a days population is growing more faster and the useful land is decreased gradua...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Like
...ngerous in any simple natural disaster. like earthquake and the whole infrastructure...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82318939682 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.348936170213 0.4932671777 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6107183849 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.875 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.79166666667 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344874322603 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136480726141 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105760647117 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225598540599 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447047196337 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.