• Task 1: The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table gives statistics about how many foreigners worked in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and how many these workers per 1000 people in these countries in 2006.
Overall, there is an upward trend in the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries from 2003 to 2006 and the United States had the highest population of this group in both 2 years. Moreover, the highest number of foreign workers per 1000 people was recorded in New Zealand.
It is substantial that 577000 immigrants worked in the United States in 2003 and then this number went up to 678000 in the next 3 years. However, with only 2.3 immigrants per 1000 people, the United States ranked last. The United Kingdom ranked second in the population of these workers, with 137000 in 2003 and 266000 in 2006. In addition, the rate of immigrants (per 1000 people) in the United Kingdom was roughly twice as much as that of the United States.
Regarding Australia, the number of immigrants was 152000 people in 2003, after escalating to 219000 in 2006 and the ratio was 10.7 in the same year. Interestingly, while New Zealand had the lowest population of foreign workers in 2003 and 2006, the ratio of immigrants in that country was the highest, 21.1 per 1000 people, fivefold higher than the figure for the United Kingdom.
- Task 2 There have been many inventions in the human history such as the wheel Some people think the most important thing is the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Task 1 The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 67
- Task 1 The maps below show the layouts of nature Museum between 2010 and 2013 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, second, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76888888889 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40370085031 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462222222222 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2032447213 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341642239401 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153996864875 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108588247027 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250101422251 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107832785242 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.