The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown.
» You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts depict the expenditures in 5 sectors in two Asian countries Japan and Malaysia.
From an overall perspective, it is clear that residents in both countries spend a large portion of their income on housing, food, and transport except for transport and healthcare.
The largest percentage is the money spent on housing in Malaysia, with over one-third (34%) while the figure for Japan is noticeably smaller, at only 24%. Similarly, the expenditure on food in the former nation also outstrips that of the latter by 27% and 24% respectively.
However, Japan surpasses Malaysia when it comes to spending on the others. Particularly, other goods and services represent up to 29% of Japanese income compared to a slightly lower portion of 26% by Malaysians. Most strikingly, the transportation expense in this nation makes up one-fifth, doubling that of the Southeast Asian country, with 20% as opposed to 10%. Being the least important sector, health care occupies a tiny minority / receives an insufficient amount of investment in both countries with 6% in Japan. Whereas, the figure for Malaysia is only half as high.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe a country can benefit a lot from university education Others believe sending a large number of young students to university leads to unemployment Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say in order to prevent illness government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table shows the proportion of female and male aged 15 and aged 75 from 1961 to 2011 in the UK 89
- The chart below gives information on the global sales of hybrid vehicles between 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gure for Malaysia is only half as high.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95347809286 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661202185792 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5580523557 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125400410578 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564389150138 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522527235938 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880578612358 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562963771188 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.