The charts below show the comparison of time spent, in minutes per day, by UK’s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table illustrates how men and women spent their spare time to entertain every day. At the same time, the bar chart compares the mean minutes that two genders spent to do household activities in 2008.
Overall, males spent more time on leisure activities than females, particularly watching TV and participating in sport. Meanwhile, women do more household chores than men, especially cooking and washing are the activities spent the most time.
Looking at the table in more detail, men spent 137 minutes to watch TV, video and listen to radio, while their counterparts spent only 118 to do these activities. In addition, engaging sport in free time was also popular with men, with 15 minutes being spent for this activity. In comparison, it took females 11 minutes to take part in sport. Reading is an activity that women enjoy more than men, with 19 minutes being spent by women and 18 minutes being spent by men.
Regarding the bar chart, there is a majority of time female spending on cooking and washing, around 67 minutes, twofold to the time spent of their partners for this activity. Furthermore, most of their time was spent on housework such as shopping, clothes washing and ironing, with 27 and 25 minutes, respectively. Meanwhile, men spent less time than their partners do these activities, with only 22 minutes being spent on shopping and 10 minutes being spent on clothes washing and ironing. Repair was only activity men spent more time than their counterparts, with 19 minutes, twofold to the time spent of females for this activity.
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 67
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, regarding, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9427480916 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55572758488 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484732824427 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7782026972 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226725039192 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112907767112 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434226281008 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167898636137 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250325064098 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.