Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people.
Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
In this day and age, it is globally believed that historically related places are being visited only by foreign people instead of the local ones. This essay will look at some primary causes of this and offer some possible solutions to the problems.
To commence with, there are several reasons why museums and historical sites are being in favor of by the foreigners than the local people. The first reason is because of the cost of the entrance tickets. Since the main goal of some historical sites would be attracting the people from all over the world, so the entrance tickets could cost expensively and unaffordably to the local inhabitants. A typical example of this is that the tickets for visiting the Monkey Island in Nha Trang cost up to nearly 200 thousand dongs per adult, not transporting fee included, which is a bit costly to the Vietnamese people. Another reason is that museums are truthfully too familiar to nearby inhabitants, therefore they might to be not interested in these places. This is because most of people could have a tendency to visit some famous places which are far from their home as not only would they have a trip but they also could improve their own knowledge.
In addition to the above analysis, there are several actions that could be taken to mitigate the problem mentioned above. First of all, historical relics need to be free for all the local people. If the local residents are given chances to come to historical places freely, the number of visitors must increase. Therefore, the popularity of these places could also improved. Another solution is that museums ought to be invested in more by the authorities to refresh the exhibits. Since the museums are refreshed yearly, local people could have a tendency to come there at least one time in a year to figure out which has been changed.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to the thinking that museums and historicals are mainly travelled to by the foreigners instead of the local residents, and measures can be implemented to tackle this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy used 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry 70
- The majority of news being reported is bad news such as wars famines accidents and crime Why do you think that is Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...rested in these places. This is because most of people could have a tendency to visit some fam...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, therefore, at least, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55123126975 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514204545455 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1643521061 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.4 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385172202705 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119896052927 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808910256475 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230912197008 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021322382908 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.