Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
In recent times, people generally have increasingly engaged in some type of work or the other across several fields. Although we may not necessarily demand it, we always receive some form of critical judgment of our work, which can come off as either positive or negative. The prompt takes the negative stance and argues that critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from an expert in the related field. I mostly disagree with this view and believe that critical judgment can be useful regardless of whether it comes from an expert for the following two reasons, though I do concede that having an expert provide critical judgment on a work can have superior merits in many cases.
To begin with, feedback is essential for continuous improvement and growth. Without feedback, it is difficult to see the areas of improvement. There can be gray areas in our works, and without a new pair of eyes observing and pointing it out, we may be oblivious to it. For example, institutions of learning and research leverage the knowledge of mentors and teachers, who may not necessarily be experts in the field but can supply critical analysis and judgment that can be useful for any student to improve upon. Another example would be in the area of arts and craft. A potential buyer could supply some valuable insights on the usability of a product that the creator may not have noticed, which when implemented could turn out to be a great innovation to their product. You do not need an expert to provide useful criticism, as criticism is an integral part of our everyday improvement and development.
Furthermore, there are limited numbers of experts in many fields, and it can be nearly impractical to only seek the opinions of an expert at every instance of need. Empirical studies have shown that a well-informed and selected crowd can be more intelligent in judgment than an expert. This is exemplified in a study that compared expert lawyers versus law students and interns, where results showed that with the right number of students, the same level of accuracy is achievable. It is tempting to overestimate the impact of experts in providing useful judgment when we can leverage the potential wisdom of the crowd, which is easily accessible to us.
However, I do concede that the impact of experts cannot be overlooked as they are able to provide not just critical judgment, but also insights inspired by years of useful practice, study, and experience. Exposure to a seasoned expert will provide a well-informed point of view and a more objective judgment, as well as cut down the stress and time wastage in engaging an equivalent crowd or aggregating their inputs.
In conclusion, while it is true that experts provide more useful, informed, and objective critical judgment of a work, leveraging other insights, particularly the opinion of others, can be useful and should not be absolutely discarded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | barcelona433 | 83 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | wopona8219 | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...es from an expert in the related field. I mostly disagree with this view and beli...
^
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...t for the following two reasons, though I do concede that having an expert provid...
^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...is easily accessible to us. However, I do concede that the impact of experts c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9595959596 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74997954747 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8057014871 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.388888889 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32409993207 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104450907346 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152915112397 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179207761928 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139784637557 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...es from an expert in the related field. I mostly disagree with this view and beli...
^
Line 1, column 608, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...t for the following two reasons, though I do concede that having an expert provid...
^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...is easily accessible to us. However, I do concede that the impact of experts c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2455.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9595959596 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74997954747 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8057014871 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.388888889 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05555555556 5.21951772744 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32409993207 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104450907346 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152915112397 0.0758088955206 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179207761928 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139784637557 0.0667264976115 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.