Some people believe that governments should invest in the arts, others argue that environmental issues should be the main focus of such investment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. Include relevant examples to support your ideas.
There is an ongoing debate on the chief purpose of government investment. While some individuals contend that governments should invest in the arts, others argue that environmental protection should be the fundamental focus. Due to the considerable merits of these viewpoints, I argue that both environmental issues and the arts should receive equitable attention from the government for the following reasons.
On the one hand, a compelling reason to prioritize government funds in the arts is the preservation of enduring cultural values. Specifically, paintings and artworks have been instrumental in depicting various historical events, offering insights into how our ancestors evolved and contributed to the sustainable development of the contemporary world. These insights have encouraged residents worldwide to continuously contribute to the development of their respective nations. For instance, numerous art masterpieces of the American war during 1954-1975 demonstrated the casualties across Vietnam, reinforcing solidarity and patriotism among young Vietnamese generations. Consequently, the Vietnamese government has directed its national resources to the establishment of a recently-created military museum for the commemoration of its glorious past.
On the other hand, the distribution of financial resources from the government should be diverted toward environmental protection to ensure human safety. The release of carbon dioxide emissions and other pollutants from agricultural and industrial activities has exacerbated global warming, leading to unpredictable changes in weather patterns. Consequently, many storms have increased in intensity and frequency, adversely affecting people’s lives in many parts of the world. For instance, the super typhoon Yagi hitting northern Vietnam in September 2024 has exerted detrimental effects on numerous individuals, including wrecking houses and agricultural crops in these areas. As a result, these devastating consequences have led to a shortage of fresh vegetables and shelter, resulting in skyrocketing prices. Therefore, it is essential for governments to invest in environmental protection to minimize the risks of severe environmental catastrophes, which is crucial for safeguarding human lives.
In conclusion, although there are some continuous arguments about the purpose of government investment, I contend that such monetary schemes should be allocated equally to both the arts and environmental issues. While environmental protection can mitigate the detrimental effects of natural disasters, various masterpieces of the arts can contribute to the cultural diversity of the nation. Achieving a financial balance in these aspects may lead to a nation’s sustainability and prosperity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-11 | Tuan Harry | 78 | view |
- More and more people today are leaving the countryside to urban areas Why is this happening Do you think it is a positive or negative development 70
- The graph below gives information about computer possession by households in one European country between 1997 and 2011 67
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...onsiderable merits of these viewpoints, I argue that both environmental issues an...
^
Line 2, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the commemoration of its glorious past. On the other hand, the distribution of f...
^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...t the purpose of government investment, I contend that such monetary schemes shou...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17098445596 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45559731199 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572538860104 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8097551989 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.117647059 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231982496643 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711031751209 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945918153478 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157602683822 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109152830911 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...onsiderable merits of these viewpoints, I argue that both environmental issues an...
^
Line 2, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the commemoration of its glorious past. On the other hand, the distribution of f...
^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...t the purpose of government investment, I contend that such monetary schemes shou...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17098445596 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45559731199 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572538860104 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8097551989 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.117647059 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7058823529 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231982496643 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711031751209 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945918153478 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157602683822 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109152830911 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 78.4519038076 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.