the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the percentage of production of electricity in France and Germany from three different sources such as conventional thermal, renewables and nuclear in 2009. Energy generated from renewable source is further classified into five sub categories such as biomass, hydroelectric, wind, solar and geothermal.
Overall, it can be seen that, while Germany produced more electricity from conventional thermal method, nuclear energy was the main power source in France in 2009. To add on, total generation of electricity in Germany was 560 k wh, while France produced 50 billion k wh less electricity in the same year.
To begin with in Germany three fifth of the total production of energy was from conventional thermal method in 2009 at 59.6% and nuclear and renewable sources produced 23% and 17.4% of electricity respectively. In further classification of renewable sources, biomass generated 39.3% of electricity, closely followed by wind at 36.9%. Surprisingly, there was no power generated from geothermal sources.
In contrast, France depended more on nuclear sources for electric power at 76% which was almost three quarter of the total production of electricity. More over, hydro electric power was the most efficient source of renewable energy in France at 80.5%, while energy produced from solar was merely 10.5%. Interestingly, like in Germany, France also did not depend on geothermal resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-20 | Hyacinthos | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-25 | wokoma elisha | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | rahulchd | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | ankit5908 | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | Manpreet kaurR | 43 | view |
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison.What do you think are the causes of this?What possible solutions can you suggest? 92
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 61
- Involvement of youth in crimes is increasing at an alarming rate Throw some light on the causes and possible solutions 90
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999. 11
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 221 200
No. of Characters: 1170 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.856 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.294 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.934 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 91 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 45 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.1 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.231 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.46 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.667 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'while', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2734375 0.268076937826 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.1015625 0.116061578633 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.13671875 0.0759168565197 180% => Less adjectives wanted.
Adverbs: 0.04296875 0.0366838410393 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00390625 0.0131127313244 30% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.1875 0.155750635184 120% => OK
Participles: 0.01953125 0.0379272487307 51% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00583981475 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0078125 0.0210936926555 37% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.03125 0.0948980150116 33% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00390625 0.00437022459523 89% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00390625 0.00967000014798 40% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1435.0 1161.00487805 124% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.9 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.49321266968 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73763899035 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.425339366516 0.337110787985 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.325791855204 0.247514529752 132% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.230769230769 0.171178102325 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16742081448 0.112407865282 149% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00583981475 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533936651584 0.546246751206 98% => OK
Word variations: 49.0897491758 49.3433353143 99% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.1 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7190373167 42.9750493124 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 135.714022679 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 23.0094962315 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.689975730869 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 54.6791855204 47.7609492067 114% => OK
Elegance: 3.23684210526 2.94281807926 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359892720431 0.418131533498 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162155054204 0.181151798455 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0715811678015 0.0850326197045 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.641227009011 0.706616315825 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15648187531 0.157042692854 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170972601063 0.228904883108 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11895676347 0.108899403657 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.325286314738 0.367819155151 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0524775673041 0.0812612215331 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266635413783 0.316326947829 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084315675197 0.0921553760075 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.02926829268 132% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.