Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Since the beginning of this century, in all distinctive civilized societies, it has been a controversial argument among individuals, through which numerous conflicts have been engendered. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that children have become less creative due to advances in technology, while others consider this issue in a whole diverse perspective. Although an absolute conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all the opposite attitudes, I strongly concur with the statement that nowadays, children have become less creative than they were in the past. The outstanding reasons for my opinion would be explored as follows.
First and foremost, they spend less time to communicate with other kids or their family. As far as I am concerned, the better you are in communicating the more ideas you will obtain. In the past, children were dedicating their time to both family and friends, so they would be able to hear others opinions and ideas. Therefore, such an activity would be such a spark for a new way of thinking. From my personal experience, when I was a little kid, I used to spend my leisure time playing with my brother. In fact, we used to share our ideas in order to create a new game, so that we would be entertained.
In addition to the less communicating and bonding, children rely on the internet too much now. I realize that some people would probably disagree with me, but it is my point of view that not only do children waste their time on the internet but also they do their homework using the internet. As a matter of fact, it appears to me as if they are cheating. For instance, my niece, Sarah, were accustomed to writing her essays using sample essays of others which were available on the internet. However, once I made her to write her essay on her own. It was unbelievable that she would not be able to think of any ideas about her essay.
Apart from the arguments that have been explored above there is another reason that deserves some words here. That is, today children spend their time on the activities that do not have educational values. To illustrate, children in the past spent their leisure time on activities such as reading which were beneficial for them. However, today, spending too much time on playing video games, surfing the net, and chatting online, most of the kids neither enhance their information nor broaden their knowledge. In my perspective, reading books provides children too many ideas which they can utilize in their life.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments that have been explored above, I agree with the statement that children were more creative in the past than they are today. Since they spend too much time on surfing the net, they do not have time to communicate with others, think about their assignments, and read books in order to improve their creativity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | hesam_75 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Tharwat | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | star435 | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) shouldn’t be allowed. 70
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
- Online encyclopedia vs traditional versions of them 86
- Whether hydrogen fuel-cell engines are better substitute for internal-combustion engines or not? 86
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'apart from', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.205081669691 0.229887763892 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.179673321234 0.158761421928 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0725952813067 0.0866891130778 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.049001814882 0.046263068375 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0943738656987 0.0685040099705 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130671506352 0.118717715034 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0562613430127 0.0351676179071 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61144274977 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.02722323049 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0780399274047 0.0887237588012 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.016333938294 0.0209618222197 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0181488203267 0.0139019557991 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2862.0 2387.08602151 120% => OK
No of words: 491.0 408.028673835 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82892057026 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.48200974243 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.295315682281 0.338922669872 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24032586558 0.251872472559 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18533604888 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0957230142566 0.112833075102 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61144274977 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478615071283 0.524397521467 91% => OK
Word variations: 55.1477954509 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.347826087 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9564189049 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.434782609 120.699889404 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.347826087 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.652173913043 0.644075263715 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 45.380412645 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.21348314607 1.45489161554 83% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38000612043 0.300154397459 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10325840262 0.103427244359 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0730652002792 0.0752933317313 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.478574671047 0.497263757937 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.127295311494 0.151897553556 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125610983438 0.114077575197 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107061416736 0.0781384742642 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.361493435114 0.336927656856 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0901475840893 0.067059652881 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254168531396 0.210909579961 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824847225377 0.0618886996521 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.