Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Looking at the statistics and general observations around us, it may seem like a particular stream of tasks is dominated by men and similarly there's another stream which is dominated by women. For example, observations within one's house could indicate that women are generally better suited for cooking as it is mostly the mothers who prepare meals and take care of the supper in a family (this can however be argued to have exceptions, especially more so in the recent times), while men are better at other mechanical tasks like fixing a television set. Let us discuss a few of these ideas in greater detail to decide if such initial impressions still hold true.
Prior to the world war times, it was only the men who used to go out in the farms and fields and work in the field of agriculture. This could be attributed to their physical strength. Since, men are usually physically stronger than women and a field like agriculture requires a lot of physical activity to be done - from pulling the carts to cutting of tree etc, it was agreed that this would be "men's" department. However, with world war times, this all changed and when men were required to go out in wars and fight for the safety of the nation and hence no longer available to work in fields and farms, it was women who overtook the agricultural industry. Post world war times, women still continue to be involved in agricultural activities as they are more accustomed to these tasks. There mere survival in the industry for all these years shows how competent they are in the field of agriculture which is contrary to the pre-world-war beliefs.
Similarly, talking about other such professions where one gender seems to be more prominent that other, such as driving heavy vehicles seem to be dominated by men - one specific example would be airplanes - most of the pilots are men. However, even though less in number, some women have proven to be great pilots. Most of the cooks seems to be women if you observe around, however, watching shows like Masterchef or even going to restaurants, one gets to realise how talented men are in the field of cooking.
Overall, however, it can be argues that men are naturally better equipped for some tasks and women for other, it is a matter of practice and willingness to learn that can change the truth about this statement and both can excel in all fields.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Arpit Sahni | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Sumaiya Mila | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rahulkcr97 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Warafta | 75 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerathe 41
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 85
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 143, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...tasks is dominated by men and similarly theres another stream which is dominated by wo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...women. For example, observations within ones house could indicate that women are gen...
^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...he pilots are men. However, even though less in number, some women have proven to be great pil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'for example', 'such as', 'talking about']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220524017467 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.174672489083 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0807860262009 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.061135371179 0.0497285424764 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.028384279476 0.0444667217837 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131004366812 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0524017467249 0.0406280797675 129% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60705844532 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0414847161572 0.030933414821 134% => OK
Particles: 0.00436681222707 0.0016655270985 262% => OK
Determiners: 0.0873362445415 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0196506550218 0.0249443105267 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0196506550218 0.0148568991511 132% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2383.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 418.0 452.878318584 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7009569378 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.308612440191 0.366273622748 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212918660287 0.280924506359 76% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.157894736842 0.200843997647 79% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0933014354067 0.132149295362 71% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60705844532 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 219.290929204 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516746411483 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.1410456109 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 32.1538461538 23.380412469 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.4653624624 59.4972553346 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.307692308 141.124799967 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1538461538 23.380412469 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 53.4457121826 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.52892561983 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221299231816 0.391690518653 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112253219182 0.123202303941 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0579614049401 0.077325440228 75% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.605996169165 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.197515858883 0.149214159877 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106306580072 0.161403998019 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499445047766 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.333699832655 0.385218514788 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0883007155671 0.0692045440612 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168320981678 0.275328986314 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385168807097 0.0653680567796 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.