The reading claims
The reading claims that using and growing genetically modified trees on large scale will bring a number of advantages. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the reading argues that genetically modified trees are more resistance than their natural counterparts. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that although modified trees are more resistance against an especial weather condition or pest, the natural trees have more genetic diversity. It means that in the pool of natural trees and for every situation possible, you will have some few trees that are resistant to that situation. Hence, if there is a new situation, you can be sure that some trees will survive, but you cannot say the same things for genetically modified trees. They are uniformly designed, and all of them have the same properties. Because of this, when they are faced with some new challenge, something like new pests or new climate change, all of them will wipe out.
Furthermore, the text holds the view that genetically modified trees can have great economic benefits for farmers. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that they are have some hidden costs that make them more expensive. The companies which design the seeds of genetically modified trees, charge more money for them. Moreover, the farmer must pay money to the companies, for each time that he uses the seeds of these trees.
Finally, the reading asserts that these trees can be an aid in preserving will trees. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that genetically modified trees can bring more damages to wild trees. These trees grow more aggressively than wild trees, and they are planted among the wild trees. Hence, they will compete with each other for natural resources, things like sun light or water. The genetically modified trees will win in this race and will crowd out the wild trees.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Printed books have had greater effects on society than televisions. 86
- The reading claims that the story of the burning mirror and Roman ships is a myth. However, the lecturer refutes this claim. In the following paragraphs, you will see her reasons to reject this claim. 73
- colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 75
- dianosur 86
- some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...essor underlines the fact that they are have some hidden costs that make them more e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'tree'
Suggestion: tree
... trees can be an aid in preserving will trees. In contrast, the speaker dismisses thi...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219178082192 0.261695866417 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.145205479452 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0904109589041 0.0723426182421 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493150684932 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0438356164384 0.0277247811725 158% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106849315068 0.128828473217 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0328767123288 0.0370669169778 89% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44508733402 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.013698630137 0.0208969081088 66% => OK
Particles: 0.00821917808219 0.00154638098197 532% => OK
Determiners: 0.131506849315 0.128158765124 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0383561643836 0.0158828679856 241% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013698630137 0.0114777025283 119% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1951.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 325.0 271.125827815 120% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00307692308 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.310769230769 0.374372842146 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.236923076923 0.287516216867 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175384615385 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113846153846 0.113142543107 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44508733402 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495384615385 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.4614556622 53.8517498576 94% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1176470588 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6702030786 49.3711431718 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.764705882 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 21.7502111507 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.878197800319 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 42.8099547511 50.5018328374 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.50574712644 1.90840788429 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294232530327 0.549887131256 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.150961075825 0.142949733639 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105054933237 0.0787303798458 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.58215614772 0.631733273073 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.130643622837 0.139662658121 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132577453155 0.266732575781 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076756004215 0.103435571967 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422764201296 0.414875509568 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0543968353396 0.0530846634433 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228409346699 0.40443939384 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706379674934 0.0528353158467 134% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.