In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, there are an increasing number of people who are excessively consuming fast foods causing fatal diseases. To solve this issue, the desperate measure should be sought. I believe that there are other alternative measures which can solve this issue more effectively than imposing of higher taxes on junk foods. Therefore, I completely disagree with the imposing of higher taxes on fast foods can reduce the consumption rates.
It is a fact that there are an increasing number of people consuming excessive amount of fast foods and the result would be the fatal health issues. Since fast food is full of chemical substances, it can cause several health diseases that can be fatal to people such as cancer, diabetes, tumor and Alzheimer. Therefore, the optimal and effective solution should be planted to tackle this issue.
Imposing higher taxes on fast food can reduce the excessive consumptions and can maintain people’s health diet. For example, McDonald’s burger price increased from $2.45 to $12.45 after junk food taxation, people will eat somewhere else. This will definitely reduce people’s consumption and people can re-consider of their choice on fast food before purchasing. Hence, higher taxation can solve the fast food consumption effectively.
However, I believe that there are other approaches can solve the excessive number of people eating fast food issues than imposing higher tax on fast food. The reason for this is, taxation can be achieved in a short run and it is not appropriate for the long term goals. In the long run, people will eventually return to their old habit of eating fast food regardless with the prices. As a result, taxation will not be the most effective solution and thus, the government should seek for other measures to solve this issue.
In conclusion, there are growing trend of eating fast food in some countries and this is considered to be an issue due to it relates to the health of people. Higher taxation on fast food seems to be the possible solutions for the government to control people’s eating habit. Since I believe that, other solutions can solve this issue more effectively than imposing taxes; the government should not impose the taxation on fast food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-17 | lananhle301 | 78 | view |
- Fossil fuels are used in many countries. Other countries use alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar power, which is encouraged. To what extent is this positive or negative development? 73
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy. 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 36
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilt of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'trends'?
Suggestion: trends
...ssue. In conclusion, there are growing trend of eating fast food in some countries a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not impose the taxation on fast food.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'however', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258373205742 0.247107183377 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.150717703349 0.155533422707 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0980861244019 0.0946595960268 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0501214627716 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0239234449761 0.0437548338989 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102870813397 0.122226691241 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0430622009569 0.0403226058552 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.69448919642 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263157894737 0.0326793684256 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0837320574163 0.0861772015684 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0478468899522 0.021408717616 223% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00717703349282 0.011925033212 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2240.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 316.048096192 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.12021857923 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.377049180328 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24043715847 0.28420135186 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.193989071038 0.203846283523 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133879781421 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69448919642 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.037074148 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.426229508197 0.56093040696 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.7409706707 60.7387585426 72% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3333333333 20.7743622355 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3329520672 49.517814964 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 127.492653851 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7743622355 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.814263465372 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 44.3770491803 49.1944974215 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.77894736842 1.69124875643 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373674184175 0.332605444948 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.154093526059 0.102741220458 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0854120458509 0.0668466124924 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572631834047 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.100915287992 0.148594505496 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164633113917 0.134430193775 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865928745622 0.0742795772207 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.41074423883 0.324371583561 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.133686733486 0.0638462369009 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269468692781 0.228012699653 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493125807249 0.058150111329 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.68436873747 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 5.90881763527 169% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 1.9629258517 51% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.4468937876 153% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.