Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Learning a foreign language becomes the mandatory in today’s society as the world has been globalized. Now the issue is whether teaching this foreign language from primary school in order to master the bilingual skills or teaching students from secondary school once they mastered a mother tongue language. Both approaches have pros and cons, but I believe that teach a foreign language at primary school would bring more downsides such as language confusion and the possibility loss of student’s identity than that of advantage, which has only a single benefit of mastering a foreign language.
Due to globalization, learning a foreign language becomes important because it is people’s competitive advantages. For example, in Korea, where children are speaking English only at school while they use Korean back home, managed perfect with their bilingual skills. If this continued, they can speak with languages easily and naturally and this means that they have a competitive advantage over other competitions for the future career.
In contrast to this benefit of languages in future career, it has a definite downside. For instance, as with the example above, realistically, many children are suffering to distinct between Korean and English between two places while they can master of bilingual skills. However, not all children are and will be followed this path. Some are failed to master this skill and they stuck at language confusions which can lead to the confusion with their identities.
Furthermore, the continuous confusion with languages can put children in dilemma and that can lead to self-identity confusions. Even though children are young and immature, they recognize of their mistakes and failure in the use of languages. Once this event becomes frequent, students may lose interest in study as a whole as well as questioning of their existence. In the case of Asian countries, they sent many young children to Western countries to grasp of better education and for the competitive advantages. However, there are many of them who have difficulties to recover from their mistakes despite other external factors (environment, culture and loneliness). As a result, these downturns of children to suffer learning a new language cannot be considered to overweigh the benefits.
In conclusion, as the world grows into complicated big one world, learning of other languages becomes important for the future careers (easier conversation). Even though this benefit is advantageous for adult’s perspective, children may suffer from various psychological illnesses such as language confusions and identity dilemmas. Therefore, I do not believe that the advantages of this issue outweigh the disadvantages.
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Some countries are not popular with using a bicycle even though it is benificial for tham. why?What are the possible solutions to envourage people to use more of bicycle as the main transport? 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 78
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2625 0.247107183377 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.133333333333 0.155533422707 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0958333333333 0.0946595960268 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0375 0.0501214627716 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375 0.0437548338989 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14375 0.122226691241 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0333333333333 0.0403226058552 83% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99527671914 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025 0.0326793684256 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0875 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0208333333333 0.021408717616 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00833333333333 0.011925033212 70% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2731.0 1933.35771543 141% => OK
No of words: 421.0 316.048096192 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.48693586698 6.12580529183 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20517956788 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.434679334917 0.374742101984 116% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.365795724466 0.28420135186 129% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.270783847981 0.203846283523 133% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.175771971496 0.137316102897 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99527671914 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.037074148 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501187648456 0.56093040696 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.8254622702 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0891783567 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.1578947368 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5413870463 49.517814964 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.736842105 127.492653851 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.947368421053 0.814263465372 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 58.7374671834 49.1944974215 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.11 1.69124875643 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422663390684 0.332605444948 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104304178191 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0778915685833 0.0668466124924 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515739314179 0.534860350844 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.107015629448 0.148594505496 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151599033177 0.134430193775 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886971852274 0.0742795772207 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.358665685129 0.324371583561 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.084626733248 0.0638462369009 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267250063507 0.228012699653 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070182476008 0.058150111329 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 5.90881763527 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 2.5751503006 311% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 10.4468937876 182% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.