Tpo23
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the decline of yellow cedar population in northwestern North America. The passage gives several arguments to say the reasons of this diminish; however, the professor, in the lecture, does not concur with the author's deduction. He gives three pieces of evidences to support the idea that text's claims are not persuasive.
In the first place, it can be deduced from the reading part that insect parasites such as cedar bark beetle cause this decline. It is mentioned that this insect eats the bark of tree and make dramatic harms to this tree. This point is challenged by the speaker. He points out that yellow cedar trees are resistant to insects as their bark saturate poisonous chemical material and it could be said that insects attack to trees that are dead and destroyed before.
Moreover, that bears have significant impacts on the decline of cedar yellow tree's population is derived from the text. Bears use the bark of cedar trees as their food supplies and by clawing these trees, they become to be destroyed. At the same time, from the listening, it can be derived that bears do not live in the northwestern North America's islands. But the trees in this location become to be devastated. Therefore, the passage's claim is not true.
The final point, presented in the article, is that gradual climate changes, such as cold climate, harm the keen roots of these trees. The lecturer, on the other hand, casts doubt on the mentioned point by taking into the account of the fact that cedar yellow trees died and destroyed in the lower elevations that the weather is relatively hot.
All in all, the reading and the listening section both talks about the reasons of yellow cedar tree's population decrease. The speaker effectively challenges the claim made in the article.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 81
- Do you agree or disagree?successful people try new things and take risk than only doing what they already know how to do well. 82
- tpo24 80
- tpo15 3
- tpo4 68
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Words: 310 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 12
No. of Words: 310 250
No. of Characters: 1482 1200
No. of Different Words: 156 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.781 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.349 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.253 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.438 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.318 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n the lecture, does not concur with the authors deduction. He gives three pieces of evi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allenges the claim made in the article.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'such as', 'in the first place', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.279883381924 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.151603498542 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0787172011662 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0291545189504 0.0435111971325 67% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0262390670554 0.0277247811725 95% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128279883382 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0408163265306 0.0370669169778 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.43600507134 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0204081632653 0.0208969081088 98% => OK
Particles: 0.00291545189504 0.00154638098197 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.142857142857 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00874635568513 0.0158828679856 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00874635568513 0.0114777025283 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1826.0 1645.83664459 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 271.125827815 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89032258065 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31935483871 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.254838709677 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.164516129032 0.187439937562 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106451612903 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43600507134 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.539623497131 96% => OK
Word variations: 52.5717073133 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.375 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3120871845 49.3711431718 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 132.220823453 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.878197800319 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 44.8588709677 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.16901408451 1.90840788429 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.766855237247 0.549887131256 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13313943567 0.142949733639 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0750509693508 0.0787303798458 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.632861976187 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158428538217 0.139662658121 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.371464610566 0.266732575781 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109665155736 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449982183619 0.414875509568 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0879713053269 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.560323910414 0.40443939384 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545722066764 0.0528353158467 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.62251655629 221% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.