TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-15 | Valeria1949 | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-07-17 | Mennatallah | 63.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-11-13 | SheLaya | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-10-27 | naznazu | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-06-15 | shishi | 61.00 | Check this speaking |
- 1413 What sorts of exercise do you not like doing? 70
- TPO 30 - Question 5 80
- 1430 Describe a picnic or meal that you ate outdoors.You should sayWhere you had this mealWho was with youWhat you ate and drankAnd explain why you enjoyed this picnic or outdoor meal. 70
- TPO 40 - Question 3 87
- Which skills do you think will be important in the future? 30
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.