TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking | |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | 10.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-12-18 | donya goodarz | Check this speaking | |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking | |
| 2018-06-25 | Mortezaa | 50.00 | Check this speaking |
- 2483 how does holding a national sports tournaments help the economy? 80
- TPO 29 - Question 4 70
- 2068 second You should say:what it waswho you learned it fromhow you learned itand explain why you think it is useful. 80
- 1917 WWM what kinds of thing make you laugh? 80
- 1749 describe a music video or a concert that has made an impression on you you should say which kind of music it was and who performed it what it was like musically what it was like visually and explain why you liked or disliked it 62
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.