Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people might say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, travelling by plane has become a very common means of transport for many people. Mainly because it's practical, quick and easy, but it also became incredibly cheap and accessible for all.
Consequently, people are highly encouraged to choose it and air traffic is increasing rapidly. Although taxing fight tickets more heavily could enable to reduce air traffic considerably, this decision could also lead to many drawbacks.
First of all, if plane tickets become more expensive, many people might reconsider their way of travelling. Therefore, this would certainly encourages more of them to take a train to travel short distances, from a European country to another, for example.
As a result of this, air traffic could decrease and new airport construction not be needed.
On the other hand, to me it is obvious that people will choose to travel using a car or a coach as an alternative way. Therefore, this would lead to lots of noise and pollution on the roads, mostly during holidays. Moreover, economically, the choice of taxing flight tickets be afforded by wealthy people. Finally, high costs flying might simply disadvantage tourism as it would slow down cultural and economic exchanges between countries.
To sump up, when beraing in mind the consequences of heavy taxes on plane tickets, it does not seem to be an appropriate solution against noise or pollution. Besides, travelling by plane is needed and important to maintain goods exchanges, tourism communication, technology development.
- Many people choose to live alone. What do you think the advantages of living alone are and do they outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020. 73
- The bar graph below shows the active membership of private sector occupational pension scheme by benefit structure in the UK, 2007 to 2014. 73
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'encourage'
Suggestion: encourage
...elling. Therefore, this would certainly encourages more of them to take a train to travel ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1284.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28395061728 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89431799655 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650205761317 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2593640956 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7692307692 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206398348706 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701547642555 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710770369269 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108137373184 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877944369337 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.