The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.
The map shows the plan to build a new supermarket in Garlsdon. Overall, it is clear that two sites possible to install the supermarket are outside of the town in the countryside (S1) and inside the city centre.
Looking at the site S1, since locating nearby the main road, the site is a potential benefit for the supermarket to reach further customers as residents in other areas can travel by train. Moreover, installing at this location could enable the supermarket to have the extension of space for parking. Also, citizens in both areas Hindon and Bransdon are able to commute by car within short distances 12km and 16km respectively.
Turning to the site S2, it is a considerable concern for shoppers parking car as well as driving since the city centre has no traffic zone. This site may be convenient for local residents only. However, people living in Cransdon (25km) and Hindon can go shopping by train.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | morbymuku | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | habeeb omran | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | andrew123 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mirandajose | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | David Shahi | 84 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 75
Comments
How can I delete a report
How can I delete a report/essay, TestBig?
Give us the link URL, we will
Give us the link URL, we will delete it for you.
testbig tech support
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, may, moreover, so, well, in short, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 758.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82802547771 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64598897532 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4020088821 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365384082975 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148809774536 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143503018384 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249431751937 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169401807067 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.