Over the pass few decades there have been a stimulating discussion about whether development in technology have brought various environmental problems or should people live a simpler lives to solve environmental problems.
Moreover, some people believe that is not possible to live without technology because technology has made life easier for businesses, company and schools, all over the world. However with the help of technology companies can now train their staff online without sending staff oversea for professional training. Beside, many schools today make iPad or computer tablet mandatory for all student for effective and smooth teaching for all student.
Meanwhile, years ago people use the form of letter writing in other to get in touch with friends and family members compare to these days where a single father can keep in check with his children when his at work. Despite these technology development school children are struggling with pencil and Biro and some cannot read and spell properly simply because they spent all their time playing games, watching movies, chatting on Facebook, twitter and Instagram. Federal and state government should set out laws that will guide young children on the use of technology so that they can be able to read and write without struggling in school.
However, so many families no longer spent quality time together simply because they are always on computer playing and chatting with friends as a result destroying family bond and distancing themselves from the family, and if it continue the marriage will not be able to survived rainy days leading to divorce and separation. Family head should try their best to make sure that there is time allocation for computer usage so that the family bond can remain without break up.
In conclusion, development in technology have brought various environment problems and also ways to simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Government need to set out laws to guide young ones on the use of computer in and out of school because is design for environmental problems not for environmental destruction.
- Some people say that the government should not put money on building theatres and sports stadiums. They should spend more money on medical care and education. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 77
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of t 56
- the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small community 73
- Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children tostay at home to look after their children.What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ompany and schools, all over the world. However with the help of technology companies c...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th friends and family members compare to these days where a single father can kee...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'these technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; these technologies
... his children when his at work. Despite these technology development school children are struggl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'continues'?
Suggestion: continues
...g themselves from the family, and if it continue the marriage will not be able to surviv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24556213018 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68700466092 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2976917307 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.181818182 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7272727273 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287064352651 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130723351057 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178387685984 0.0667982634062 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19845549183 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177703399975 0.056905535591 312% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.