The cart below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

Submitted by Nigaris on Thu, 01/05/2017 - 17:09

Six pie charts demonstrate the data regarding the proportion of water used for three factors in five continents.

As can be seen from the charts the usage of water has similar pattern in North America and Europe. The fraction for industrial usage of water is with the highest numbers : the former is accounted for 49%, the latter for 53%. Consequently, water allocated for agriculture and home is consumed together in almost equal percent of industrial but in reverse pattern - 52% in North America and 47% in Europe.

Similarly, three other parts of the world - Africa, Central and South West Asia - use water likewise. Agriculture makes up a particularly large portion in terms of consumption of water in all terrains(approximately 84%), while industry and house needs play a minor role in usage of water(about 7% in average). On the other hand, South America has similarity in usage with this group but not in the percentages, which are fracionaly different - agricultural usage is 71%, which leads to the fact that two other options are between 10% and 20%.

Overall, developed countries devote most of their water in industry, whereas developing areas are tended to use water more for agriculture.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Six pie charts demonstrate the data regarding the proportion of water used f...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age is 71%, which leads to the fact that two other options are between 10% and 20...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10659898477 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95069439156 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0232655183 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 5.23603664747 220% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170386254374 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783408700771 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426217518167 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110312038695 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234059138339 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.