Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking Therefore the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Research has shown that overeating is as harmful as smoking. Therefore, the advertising of certain food products should be banned in the same way as the advertising of cigarettes in some countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that food’s advertisements should be banned since overeating could possess potential threats to human as smoking could. Personally, I disagree with the statement since smoking harms people’s health anyway, but eating properly could still be advantageous.

On the one hand, it overeating might negatively affect human’s health. The fact is that many individuals are likely to have obesity when absorbing excessive amount of fat. For example, people who eating fast food products frequently are prone to gain weight and weaken the immune system because of the extravagant amount of fat they obtained. Moreover, overeating might harm people’s health when they are on an unbalanced diet. It is possible for people to lack of adequate nutrients to boost their health when their daily meals are short of important ingredients, namely some sorts of essential vitamins. Indeed, it is severely harmful when people eat in an inappropriate way.

On the other hand, smoking owns evident harmful effect, while eating in a suitable way still improve human’s health. Lots of research has pointed out that smoking severely degrades people’s health in anyway. Smokers are usually on the edge of having cancer, since toxic chemicals in cigarettes’ smoke possesses perilous effects to human’s organs, such as the lungs, let alone the non-smokers who inactively inhale the smoke. Conversely, having suitable diets certainly affords people better health. It is apparent that when the body is provided the necessary nutrients, people could stay healthy. If people are aware of maintaining daily meals that are balanced in terms of nutrients, there would be a sufficient intake of vital vitamins and minerals to boost people’s health.

In short, It seems to me that since smoking damages people’s health in every way, its advertisements should definitely be banned, but not for those of food products because they only harm people when consumed inappropriately.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (22 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-01 quynhnhu1921996 84 view
2021-08-05 FineSsa 78 view
2020-08-16 Emmaaa 73 view
2020-06-05 Hương Giang 47 view
2019-07-28 Thu Phung 73 view
Essays by user thanhcaohoang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate way" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... it is severely harmful when people eat in an inappropriate way. On the other hand, smoking owns evi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a suitable way" with adverb for "suitable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ns evident harmful effect, while eating in a suitable way still improve human's health. Lots...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: IN_ANYWAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in any way'?
Suggestion: in any way
... severely degrades people's health in anyway. Smokers are usually on the edge of hav...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...having suitable diets certainly affords people better health. It is apparent that when...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, conversely, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in short, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57328990228 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99647711612 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1508069608 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.066666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13690448897 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536262553481 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515362631204 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111675645887 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519447120541 0.056905535591 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.