Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is argued that all people are privileged to pursue higher education and the tuition fee should be sponsored completely by the state regardless to the budgets of students. In my opinion, I totally agree with this idea.
On the one hand, tuition free in higher education institutions may trigger some problems. Firstly, it can impose a financial burden on state budget as the government must cover all academic costs for students. For instance, Finland government used to provide both domestic and international students with 100% scholarships for tuition fees; however, this policy is going to stop from the spring semester in 2017 (for international only) because of insufficient budget. Secondly, although the idea is considered as an educational revolution as well as a study promotion policy, the developing and underdeveloped countries may find it impossible to implement as they should spend the expenditure properly to address other pressing social issues such as unemployment or poverty alleviation.
On the other hand, I believe that it would be of greater benefits for educational and the economic aspects. From the educational standpoint, students will be encouraged to pursue higher education, which means more skillful labor force in the future. If high costs for further education prevent students from accessing, it is now no longer a problem. Moreover, proficient labor force is closely linked with a drive for the economy. They will contribute greatly to solve economic problems and are able to prevent economic crisis. As a result, other related social issues like unemployment and poverty can be tackled.
In conclusion, it seems to me that tuition free at universities is more advantageous and should be encouraged.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-20 | Esmaeil949 | 67 | view |
2019-09-19 | tran ngoc lam | 73 | view |
2019-03-05 | Minh Minh Noo | 78 | view |
2019-01-18 | TramPhuong | 84 | view |
2018-04-11 | bdq1223 | 84 | view |
- The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address those problems? 73
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems? 56
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 81
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education, and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37591240876 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02066558678 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.0967584416 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2307692308 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175950566297 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626577544563 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395763277281 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108129372493 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295397692916 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.