The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.
The line graph compares changes in the price of three different types of food product groups and the overall trend in the consumer-price index over a 30 years period from 1978 to 2009.
It is clear from the line graph that all the amounts of Fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks all increased. Additionally, the figure for Fresh fruits and vegetables was higher than the consumer-price index average during the research period.
In 1979, all the lines on the graph have the same starting figure of about 60. The consumer-price index rose steadily from about 60 to over 200 in 2009. Prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks witnessed similar trends. Although their prices went up, they were consistently below the consumer-price index average after 1987. The number of sugar and sweets was 200 in 2009 higher than the amount of carbonated drinks, at 150.
Prices for Fresh fruits and vegetables rose dramatically after 1989. In 2009, the amount of Fresh fruits and vegetables increased to roughly 300 and became the highest figure, above the consumer-price index average.
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket. 73
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in completing the work experience requirement for university students. 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK (per week) from 1970 to 1990. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 78
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72756977834 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9101612026 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359164611808 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15047763543 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695041734301 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225365843857 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419478545473 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.