Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people insist that the subjects such as technology and science only need to be granted to study in the university as these technical subjects remain worthwhile in the future. I am totally in favour of the idea that students ought to be handed choices over the subjects. This essay will discuss both sides and support my opinion with relevant examples.
On the one hand, proponents claim that allowing vital subjects such as science and technology can improve the standard of life and prove highly convenient. To illustrate, if students succeeded in science, this subject would open excellent opportunities to become renowned surgeons who usually earn handsome salaries that remain considerably two to three times higher than the other professionals' salaries such as teachers, government workers and many others. In addition, as doctors give second life to a critically injured patients by performing successful lifesaving surgeries, they are often regarded as a god in most of the developing countries. Learning technology well in the university can allow students in the future to do jobs at the comfort of their home while completing other household activities at the same time.Therefore, choosing these crucial subjects proves how they can uplift the quality of lives of the students significantly.
On the other hand, I would argue that letting youngsters to select their favourite subjects has proved far more beneficial than preventing them from picking their best courses. Because students would analyse deeply, look for various resources and the rest others if they were permitted to select the topics. In other words, when they study with passion and great interest, regardless of any difficulties, they would never give up. Instead, many students are found to hold discussions with peers in order to find solutions. Although technical subjects can upgrade the general well being of lives of students in the future, forcing them to choose these courses against their interests may lead to severe mental pressure, stress and subsequently doom to complete failure. Moreover, such subjects only suit to those students who possess enormous talents, make great sacrifices and so on.
To conclude, although technical subjects can make life easy in the course of time, students who are made learnt against their concerns and enthusiasms ultimately tend to fail. So, students should be permitted to pick their own courses.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities.Others,however,say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both views and give your own op 90
- Being a celebrity- such as a famous film star or sports personality- brings problems as well as benefits.Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 78
- The two charts show the main sources of energy in the USA in 1980 and 1990.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 79
- Some people believe that the salaries paid to professional sportspeople are too high, while others argue that sports salaries are fair. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 97
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Comments
Essay evaluation report
While some people insist that the subjects such as technology and science only need to be granted to study in the university as these technical subjects remain worthwhile in the future. I am totally in favour of the idea that students ought to be handed choices over the subjects.
While some people insist that the subjects such as technology and science only need to be granted to study in the university as these technical subjects remain worthwhile in the future, I am totally in favour of the idea that students ought to be handed choices over the subjects. //'while' is for a clause, so we need comma instead of period here.
flaws:
Too much content for examples:
To illustrate, if students succeeded in science, this subject would open excellent opportunities to become renowned surgeons who usually earn handsome salaries that remain considerably two to three times higher than the other professionals' salaries such as teachers, government workers and many others. In addition, as doctors give second life to a critically injured patients by performing successful lifesaving surgeries, they are often regarded as a god in most of the developing countries.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 2011 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.21 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.638 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 154 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 89 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.733 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.649 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.528 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents by performing successful lifesaving surgeries, they are often regarded as a ...
^^
Line 3, column 829, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...r household activities at the same time.Therefore, choosing these crucial subjects proves...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with peers in order to find solutions. Although technical subjects can upgrade ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 385.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34805194805 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74989504392 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592207792208 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.3521020197 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.266666667 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31162304692 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990349833398 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069441695242 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189114816284 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736945114218 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.