The graphs show the percentage of the population of a computer ownership between 2002 and 2010 and a computer ownership by education level by the year 2002 and 2010.
The first graph, the percentage of computer ownership without education was the lowest by 58% in 2002. The percentage of computer ownership was slightly grown 80% in 2004. Moreover, computer ownership was rising 68% and 75% between 2006 and 2008. In 2010, computer ownership was the highest percentage of 80%.
The second graph, The percentage of computer ownership by education level in 2010 the highest proportion was a postgraduate by 90%. Moreover, the percentage of computer ownership by education level was college (incomplete) by 80% in 2010. In 2002, a high school graduate by 35% and bachelor's degree by 55%. On the other hand, the lowest percentage of computer ownership by education level was no high school diploma by 15% in 2002
To conclusion, the percentage of both computer ownership without education and the proportion of computer ownership by educating level was rising in 2010.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- It is important to lean the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.to what extend do you agree and disagree with this opinion?what sort of punishment should parents and teachers be a 56
- The bar chart below shows the estimated percentage of car trips taken by drivers in 2005 56
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?Discuss both these views and give your own o 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecti 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graphs show the percentage of the po...
^^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ducation was the lowest by 58% in 2002. The percentage of computer ownership was sl...
^^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eover, computer ownership was rising 68% and 75% between 2006 and 2008. In 2010, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, second, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18390804598 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84718931341 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 63.0 106.607317073 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.362068965517 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.2315429682 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3527984002 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2089227566 0.103423049105 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124642903648 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310512009306 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114532754686 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.12 8.06136585366 76% => OK
difficult_words: 17.0 40.7170731707 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.