It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship. Do you agree? Why or why not? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
From very ancient times, money were a reason of conflicts and wars. In the same way, nowadays, people can see a myriad of stories on TV, where people kill each other for money. Moreover, very often the victims are close relatives of friends to the killers. Therefore, I am of oppinion that borrowing money from a friend undoubtedly can be damaging for the relationships.
First of all, some people simply are not about borrowing money to anyone. Let us assume that one of friends is in difficult sircumstances and is asking to lend some money from his friend. If the friend refuses the reaquest because of his principle do not borrow money to anyone, the first one can get offended and take it as a refusal to help. This way, both of the friends will feel very awkward and uncomfortable in a company of each other, and probably will try to avoid each other in the future. Althoug for some people money are not significant and they take borrowing to a friend for granted, not everyone of the same oppinion.
Secondly, some people have sirious problems with giving money back. For example, back in college, one of my friends borrowed money from me constantly and never gave it back. The ammouns were small. But, if consider that I was a working student and did not have financial support from my patents, any amount of money was priceless to me. As a concequence I got tired from such as attitude of my friend and terminated the friendship. Not givig money back for me is expressing absence of respect toward the person, who lends money. In turn, a friendship is impossiable without respect between friends.
To that end, I think that in order to protect a friendship from damaging, it it better do not borrow money from friends. This is because people think differentely about whether they should lend money to their friends or give money back to a friend if they borrowed it.
- Some people prefer to work for themselves or own a business. Others prefer to work for an employer. Would you rather be selfemployed, work for someone else, or own a business? Use specific reasons to explain your choice. 66
- If food tastes good it is probably bad for you How far do you agree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 58
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is time we all relied less on private motor vehicles to get around, and instead used other forms of transport. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 73
- In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be damaging for the relationships. First of all, some people simply are not...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
... to protect a friendship from damaging, it it better do not borrow money from friends...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
...otect a friendship from damaging, it it better do not borrow money from friends. This ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y back to a friend if they borrowed it.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, such as, first of all, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6656626506 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54971436242 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7538522601 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0555555556 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238047880219 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863466943976 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555952905073 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167308344174 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261416371952 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.