How does technology affect our relationships? In negative or positive way
The advent of technology has influenced people relationships in many different ways. In my opinion, this technological breakthrough and day-to-day use of variety devices have both positives and negatives. This essay will highlight these effects.
It is undeniable that daily life has become easier than before. Firstly, nowadays in business companies; seniors and their employees are able to contact with partners residing in foreign countries via e-mail and secure all required targets. Therefore, the result is the massive growth in economy all over the world resulting in soaring new employment opportunities. Secondly, the widespread of many platforms leads to facilitate making new friends all over the world with different mentalities, interests, and cultures. Thus, making people more intellectual and broaden horizons. Finally, all parents have the opportunity to combine with getting higher degrees and caring their dependants, especially these who are the breadwinners by corresponding via internet and attending their courses. This means is called distance learning and it is becoming more familiar to day.
On the other hand, these earth-shattering devices cause children who used to be seen playing outdoors to sit in front of their computers for long time; resulting in a high rise in obesity among kids and adolescents. Therefore it could negatively impact their self-esteem to mix with others not to experience bullying. In addition, since corresponding by social platforms and chatting has become more familiar than gathering and having face to face communication, family bond would be loosened then ending up dispersed people.
To sum up, having this technology has many pros and cons on our daily life. However, it is considerably different to use these devices in order to facilitate this life and to let them rein in our whole life and become unsociable with each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | wwwdung | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | m_sepahi@ymail.com | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-20 | vishal sachdeva | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | 22rashmi | 84 | view |
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequent change job To what extent do you agree or disagree 55
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be ran by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages. 88
- How does technology affect our relationships? In negative or positive way 11
- Today, the qualities of life of people in big cities are worse. What are the causes of this problem? Any measures should be taken to solve it? 84
- Some people think that governments in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life, while others believe that in order to achieve that governments should offer free education for all. Discus 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... has influenced people relationships in many different ways. In my opinion, this technological...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... in obesity among kids and adolescents. Therefore it could negatively impact their self-e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48805460751 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99284130762 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617747440273 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5644180221 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0772253931343 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028545997859 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456650642794 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595693037693 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526191370489 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.