The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from.
The line graph clearly illustrates the number of tourist came to Australia between 1975 and 2005. Then the table depicts the amount of visitors from six different countries in the two years 1975 and 2005.
As far as graph is concerned, it is quite apparent that the figures for tourist in Australia increased over the entire period. The quantity of tourists was almost 9 million in 1975 and increased gradually to nearly 16 million. Over the next decade, there was a significant growth in the tourist figures, almost doubled in 1985 and rose steadily to 30 million at the end of the period.
Regarding to table, It is noticeable that the south Korean and Japanese tourist who visited Australia, shared nearly same figures in both years and exceeding the numbers from any other country. More specifically, Japanese increase from 2.9 to 12 million and South Korean tourist from 2.9 to 9.1 million. There was hardly any difference between the numbers of tourist from other countries.
To sum up, it would be quite true to say that the tourist figure went up during the period and vast of majority of tourist came from Japan and South Korea in 1975 and 2005.
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries. 67
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly.Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world. Do you think that ben 78
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 62
- Popular events like the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tension and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 89
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, then, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43154272017 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8701361395 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146195818293 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747119355425 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594073225225 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101828495881 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773697092891 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.