Many people blame increasing crime rates for violent television programs. Others believe means of media offer many helpful ways to raise public awareness. Discuss both views state your opinion.
Some individuals argue that violent television programs leads to increasing crime rates. However, I agree with the idea that means of media bring a variety of benefits to raise public awareness.
To begin with, there are quite plausible reasons for rising crime rates because of broadcast programs which are violent. First of all, the content of television programs are not strictly controlled. In other words, the excess of violent content would be affected children’s curiosity. As a result, being approached these in a long period leads to the imitation of children who could become juvenile crimes. In addition, crime is one of the popular subjects of most news programs. For example, the mass media focuses on violent and sensational crimes to attract more viewers. Consequently, a child would find it naturally to acquire detrimental behaviours which they have seen every day when growing up in a violent crime-ridden community.
On the other hand, convincing argument can be made that means of media contribute to raise general consciousness. First and foremost, technology’s development leads to means of media’s one which can improve people’s knowledge. To be more specific, it gives individuals chances to access to the huge and unlimited knowledge about arts, expertise and languages. Secondly, means of media can make learning more interesting. For instance, Vietnamese teenagers can watch documentary films about Vietnam war to study about Vietnam history, instead of reading a book which has a great number of words without real pictures.
In conclusion, although there are a wide range of reasons why violent programs can impact in increasing crime rates, I am convinced that means of media have a part in raising general awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-22 | Van Luong Ngoc Thuy | 78 | view |
- Many people blame increasing crime rates for violent television programs. Others believe means of media offer many helpful ways to raise public awareness. Discuss both views state your opinion. 78
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are reasons for these behaviors? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 84
- Recycled products are considered a safe way to save the environment. However, there are many agruments that recycling process often releases low quality outcome. Discuss both views and state your opinion. 78
- The maps show the changes o Shalton village from 1910 to 2010 59
- Some animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea. What are the reason? What solution to solve them? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...being approached these in a long period leads to the imitation of children who could ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expertise and languages. Secondly, means of media can make learning more interest...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42238267148 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01183008101 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606498194946 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4503344585 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.133333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7333333333 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231621362002 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790235761768 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529029055097 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156544124696 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044283526165 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.