Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
It is true that many countries have been suffered negative impacts from global tourists. There are two major reasons for this behavior and both of them should be tackled by local authorities.
A few reasons can be given to justify for the negative effects from international tourists to some countries. One reason is that in many nations, the influx of tourists from other countries has brought with its problems such as prostitution as well as alcoholism and drug abuse. From the perspective of local citizens, this result has negative effects in the images of their countries in the world. Also, the environmental degradation that international tourism has caused to many parts of the world. This is detrimental to both the scenery and the environment where local citizens live such as water pollution as well as trash pollution and air pollution.
There are several actions that authorities could take to solve problems described above.
First, national and local authorities ought to impose an official ban on the use of stimulant as well as joining unhealthy activities on tourists. If global tourists adhere to this rule, negative impacts from this would be decreased. Second, national authorities should campaign travelers taking part in some activities for environmental protection to achieve sustainable development on tourism. For example, authorities should encourage local inhabitants and travelers take part in some environmental protection activities such as Green Summer and collect plastics around where they live.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons for the negative impacts of international tourism to some countries, and steps need to be taken to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | Akhilgeorge | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-30 | Abhayraj | 78 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | taho.ielts | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | taho.ielts | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-02 | taho.ielts | 73 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 91
- It is impossible to help people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer, do you agree or disagree? 56
- More and more people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities 85
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40298507463 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93471513219 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522388059701 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2834012615 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169093670536 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693517835265 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569234313532 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101144999742 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066134499893 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.