Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters . support it or not
Undoubtedly, no one can abnegate that every successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Every country has its own sports stars and film stars. We get to read about them, see them on television and also follow them on social media like twitter and snap chat. Youngsters follow their favorite stars blindly and try to imitate them in multiple ways. However, one section of the society believes that they have great influenced all over the world for their glamorous life style and other opposes this notation. I also think that the youth should be smart enough to select their role models.
To initiate, there are multiple reasons for youth to follow their idol. The first and foremost reason is that they motivate the youth to gain health or wealth. This is good for the individual’s growth as a person physically as well as mentally. To follow their footprints, individual can get fame easily, so it is a popular way to get attention of the society. It helps to enhance fear management skill. In some movies, individuals learn how to prepare themselves in extreme situations. They develop to boost self- confidence, independent behavior.
Diving deeper into the topic, on other hand, some people believe that it has also some negative effects on the youth. Many of the celebrities endorse in cigarette and alcohol brands. Adverts of these brands have negative effects on the youth . Some individuals who fall to achieve their goals try to commit suicide. Some celebrities are notable for their lavish life style rather than their achievements which gives negative effects. Glamorous life style cannot suit common man. Some negative roles play by film stars also promote crime and other criminal acts.
In the crux, film stars and celebrities are not perfect human beings and sometimes they promote crime and other bad activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-13 | GAGAN mehra | 77 | view |
- The role of human cloning has accelerated rapidly To what extent you think will it replace the material things 51
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Agree or disagree. Pros and cons 77
- Pros and cons of extreme/adventurous sports 77
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society . 69
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write , but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rands have negative effects on the youth . Some individuals who fall to achieve th...
^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...promote crime and other bad activities.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 310.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05161290323 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54033130805 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 12.6551724138 166% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1172312646 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.5714285714 104.977214359 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7619047619 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.19047619048 7.25397266985 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272471821091 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759274843843 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131031047426 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157251362282 0.151781067708 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131233018588 0.0609392437508 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 12.6369458128 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.