Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Earth, where a vast variety of species live, is one of the most important planets in the solar system and it is also of vital importance to human being. The earth provides diverse resources we need to survive and is the only planet capable of life existence in the solar system. Some people believe that human activities have been harming the earth, others would disagree. In my view human activities have brought a huge damage to the earth for two main reasons.
First, many of these activities cause global warming. Cutting trees down for various goals including paper production and providing material for some structures, numerous factories and vehicles all over the world have made an increase in earth temperature. For instance, in 2004 an international organization reported that compared to 10 years before that time in 1994 the average temperature of the earth has increased by one degree. The researchers mentioned that the huge amount of worldwide carbon dioxide produced by cars and industrial factories entered to earth atmosphere has brought about this change. This issue will cause a significant change in sea and ocean levels and will threaten lives on earth. As you can see, destructive activities of human being is a menace to the survival of earth.
Second, different human activities result in extinction of different species. Overhunting of some animals has always destroyed the natural instinct of the earth. Sea pollution has also had an adverse effect on various lives of species. For example, environmentalists revealed a report in 2010 stating that 100 species are in the risk of demise due to different contaminants entered by human being to oceans. This experience clearly illustrates that destructive activities of human being have put many lives in danger, and led to drastic changes in the nature of earth.
In sum, though some may think that human activities have culminated in making the world a better place, but I believe the opposite is true. Not only have these activities caused global warming but also led to the extinction of variety of species witch both will change and subsequently destroy the earth planet. I advise every human being to modify their activities in order to save the world and make it a better place not only for us but also for all living species on earth.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community Do you support or oppose the factory Explain your position 62
- Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge damage'.
Suggestion: huge damage
...n my view human activities have brought a huge damage to the earth for two main reasons. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, for example, for instance, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02590673575 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69041170131 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523316062176 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1301386334 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.777777778 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322986650086 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114446557556 0.076458572812 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835039714769 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216353518924 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492131301829 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.