The chart bellow shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1979 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparasion where relevant
The line graph illustrates the propotion of distinction in income between male and female over the period of 30 years.
Overall, it is clear that there was a general decline in the propotion of different income according the different genders.The figure for Japan was remained at the highest point while the lowest number was changed between Australia and France in 2008.
US, UK and France saw a continually decrease from 1978 to 2008. The number of US declined rapidly from around 33% in 1978 to about 27% in 2008. In UK, this number was approximately 30% in 1978 and decreased at around 27% in 2008 while the figure for France decreased slightly about 3% over the 30 years period.
In 1978, the number for Japan had reached a peak at around 48% and this number was always remained above 40% from 1978 to 2008. Meanwhile, Australia was accounted for the lowest point with only about 18% in 1978 and then decreased slightly over the period of 20 years. From 1998 to 2008 the number of difference in income between genders in Australia rose dramatically to roughly 23% in 2008.
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- More and more people in the city lice in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is negative or possitive development. 73
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevantYou should write at least 150 words 61
- As well as making money, business also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 67
- The tables bellow show result of a survey of urban resident s opinions related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... income according the different genders.The figure for Japan was remained at the hi...
^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('continually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
... France in 2008. US, UK and France saw a continually decrease from 1978 to 2008. The number of US dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71957671958 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49081063554 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8955877137 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121666624335 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718087770919 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055991887318 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837223240573 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198400274082 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.