tpo-42
In the reading, the author presents 3 solutions to prevent birds from injuries when they try to fly through glass windows. However, finding all solutions questionable and ineffective, the lecturer totally repudiates them and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that one-way glass is a practical approach to prevent injuries to birds since they cannot see through a window and so will not try to pass through it. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that this solution still has a problem. The reflexing light from the surface of these one-way makes them look like mirrors. Owing to the fact that outside birds cannot recognize mirror too, they probably still hurt themselves, Especially when the glass reflex the image of sky or tree. In this case, the birds think there are sky or trees in front of them.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that painting regular window glass with colorful lines and designs can make birds avoid trying to fly through it. Moreover, architects can benefit from this approach by including these designs in their works. That being said, the lecturer disputes it by clarifying the fact that birds perceive the openings made between the lines as open holes; thus, they would try to fly through them. Should the space between the lines and designs become smaller, the room will be dark since there is no enough space for passing the lights.
Finally, the author draws attention to creation an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from glass as the last solution to prevent birds from hurts. Yet again, the lecturer dismisses it by pointing out that it is true that birds have a natural ability to sense magnetic but they only use this ability for far distances such as migrating from northern hemisphere to south or vice versa. For short distances, they rely on their eyes and the brightness of their surrounding areas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, in addition, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9226006192 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35806026164 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6072966772 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.571428571 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524511663602 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163783686668 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118381512629 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299238523775 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484555894547 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.