the Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

the Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this day and age, the information revolution has become a controversial debate among people all around the world. Although mass communication is regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a considerable number of people, there are a number of people hold an opponent's view. I am inclined to highly believe that mass communication is quite beneficial as they could help people to share their idea globally.

To begin with, there are several reasons why I support mass communication has a positive impact on people. First and foremost is that mass communication causes an individual to share their ideas more easily. Secondly, a large number of students and scientists are able to receive latest technology and researcher from other countries. Lastly, many thanks to information technology which led families to get in touch with their children who are leaving in abroad. Thus, there is no doubt that mass communication is a part of a life of people on a daily basis.

However, there is no doubt that mass communication can provide people with various negative points. Mass communication can harm young children and people who are not used of this technology in appropriate ways. It is highly argued that this communication led to destroy the foundation of families in the third world countries. for example, Harvard University researcher undertook a study to understand the relationship between children how uses new technology more than two hours a day. The results revealed that higher use new information is negatively correlated with less productivity at schools. Hence, the more time spend on mass communication, the less productivity we will face.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my personal sentiment is that the benefits of mass communication far outweigh its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (12 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-21 Rajnikant Chauhan 77 view
2018-08-28 mohsen j 80 view
2018-12-13 Rajnikant Chauhan 80 view
2018-07-04 khushbu_T 85 view
2020-10-29 Basil3241 72 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Amir NIkzad :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hare their ideas more easily. Secondly, a large number of students and scientists are able to rec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'receive the latest'.
Suggestion: receive the latest
... of students and scientists are able to receive latest technology and researcher from other co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... families in the third world countries. for example, Harvard University researcher ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thus, while, for example, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30034129693 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10250734746 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3363156139 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163242714268 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059278243047 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338554138172 0.071462118173 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992881031809 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264035968525 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.