Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people like when their work routine stady and is not diverse when others prefer to do different things during a workday. Personally, I think that people are happier when their tasks days at work are alternated. There are a few reasons why I hold this opinion.
First of all, when workers perform different tasks, they make lesser mistakes. There is no doubt that constant repetition of something helps to master it. However, when a person does something continuously all day long, he stops be careful since he thinks that he can do it perfectly. Unfortunately, such as confidence very often causes multiple errors. My own experience is a compelling example of that. As a pharmacy technician, during my work day, I have to switch a station I work on every two hours. To clarify, I have to enter prescriptions in a computer system for to hours, then count medication for the same time span, after that, I have to release the patients. Such as rotation on the workflow aimed to decrease the number of errors made by the team members. When we rotate, we change the environment and reset our brain to the new task. It helps us not only to avoid mistakes but also catch them if they took place. That is why it is crucial to diversify a work process.
Secondly, when workers have an opportunity to do a different kind of tasks, their job becomes more interesting. If a person does the same things all day long, he gets bored. Furthermore, a boring job does not make people happy but makes them think of finding the other one. Conversely, when a person fascinated with his work, his overall satisfaction of live rises. For instance, as I said above, I work in a retail pharmacy where I am able to perform a variety of tasks. In this way, each day at the pharmacy is colorful and fascinating for me and because of that, I love my job. Moreover, I always go to work with great pleasure, which is crucial for me since I work a full-time job and spend a lot of time at the workplace. This example illustrates the value of diversifying a work routine for employees.
To conclude, I strongly believe that it is better for workers to do a variety of tasks. This is because it helps to prevent errors on a work floor, and makes the job pleasant.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing things they like to do – rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 93
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work floor, and makes the job pleasant.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i think, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53086419753 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66722216436 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4414603469 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4583333333 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54166666667 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246523119889 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643250058091 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06997289977 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155699318589 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734805235481 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.