In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong. Others consider it as a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Nowadays, the question “ whether employing children at an early age is a reasonable decision or not?” has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world. It is a widely held view that working in a certain age is highly beneficial, whereas one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that employing children in several kinds of paid works plays a vital role in each society. To put into consideration, I express why I do not support this idea. First and foremost is that the majority of children are forced to undertake some responsibilities, such as washing dishes, cleaning floors, and serving foods in restaurants that do not bring them any valid knowledge. Secondly, it can be argued that they have to work in demanding circumstances. For example in factories with a low level of income rather than adults. Therefore, it can be a kind exploitation. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that their lessons might be neglected and subsequently, they will be failed in their examinations. A group of socialists, working at prestigious university conducted that such children are more likely vulnerable and are exposed to unsafe and hazardous works.
However, there is no doubt that employing children provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that they think working at an early age gives children a sense of independence and self-confidence to undertake prominent responsibilities. Moreover, they will be able to achieve a wide variety of valuable experiences that are excessively efficient in the future.
To recapitulate, I entirely disagree with employing children at an early age so that some useful actions must be taken into account to address this problem. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 80
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views 80
- The importance of travel seems to be overrated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 78
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agr 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nable decision or not?' has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are hoped to heighten their intellect.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18944099379 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11485109838 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590062111801 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.75717611 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157602367453 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534464164535 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293685896045 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0908965437278 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030236188432 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.