Integrated essay TPO14
The reading mainly discusses that forest fires and some of disasters which happen in the forests, have to deal with such salvage logging that there are many advantages for human and forests, it illustrates three reasons to supports. On the other hand, the professor rejects the authors' view and asserts that these reasons are not effective.
First of all, the article states that the dead trees should remove in the forest after fire due to they need a lot of time to decompose, therefore, new trees can grow well in new spaces where is prepared. On the contrary, the speaker in the listening, believes that cleaning up the forests of dead trees is not necessary and does not increase more situations to grow some new trees.
In addition, the reading passage point out that the trees that destroied in the fires or somthing like that, not oly takes they more spaces, but also many insects habitat on them such as the apruce bark beetle, then will damage live.. In contrast, the professor argues that this is true that spruce ia dengerous to live, but these dead trees are more available for other animals such as birds and beers that can settle on them, not just for insects.
Finally, the text states that salvage logging are more econimical that the number of industries are dependent on them to produce more products. However, the lecturer refutes that idea bu staing this way need more money and time. In fact, he believes that to moving this deed trees vehicles to moving such as helicopters and it is more expensive, thus, government can improve more conditional job for people in another issues.
- Do you agree or disagree?Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. 61
- integRATED ESSAY -TPO 40 85
- integrated essay TPO13 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are. 70
- integrated essay-TPO46 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading mainly discusses that forest...
^^^^
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the disasters') or simply say ''some disasters''.
Suggestion: some of the disasters; some disasters
... mainly discusses that forest fires and some of disasters which happen in the forests, have to de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'insects'' or 'insect's'?
Suggestion: insects'; insect's
...y takes they more spaces, but also many insects habitat on them such as the apruce bark...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 233, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...pruce bark beetle, then will damage live.. In contrast, the professor argues that ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, in fact, such as, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81294964029 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31305872618 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561151079137 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.0310967892 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.8888888889 7.06452816374 253% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396687717969 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141371121501 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665649446729 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213234527647 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296870719117 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.